I appreciate your request, but I need to clarify an important issue: **the passage you've provided is not standard ACT English text**.
What you've shared appears to be:
- **Scientific diagrams and experimental data** (spring compression measurements, trials)
- **Tables** (de-icer proof data at different temperatures)
- **Multiple-choice questions** about interpreting these data
This is **ACT Science** material, not **ACT English**. ACT English passages are narrative or expository prose with underlined portions for grammar/style revision.
**ACT Science questions** don't involve underlining portions of prose text—they test your ability to read graphs, tables, and experimental descriptions to answer comprehension and analysis questions.
**To help you effectively, I need clarification:**
1. Are you looking for HTML rendering of the **tables and data** as a science passage reference?
2. Do you have an actual **ACT English prose passage** you'd like me to format with underlines and subscript question numbers?
3. Or would you like me to create an HTML document that displays these tables and scientific content for reference with the questions?
Please provide the actual text passage (if it exists), and I'll render it in the HTML format you've described.
Some physics students conducted experiments to study forces and springs. They used several identical springs attached to the bottom of a level platform, shown below in Figure 1.
Figure 1
The length of each spring was 0.30 m when there were no weights attached. The springs had identical spring constants. When weights were attached, the length of the springs increased as the force of the weights stretched the springs downward. The length the springs stretched was proportional to the force of the weight.
Experiment 1
The students attached different weights to two springs at once. When the springs stopped oscillating and came to a rest, the students measured their length. In Trial 1, a 10.0 N weight was attached to Spring A and Spring B, which were attached 0.25 m apart on the board. In Trial 2, a 15.0 N weight was attached to Spring A and Spring B. In Trial 3, a 20.0 N weight was attached to Spring A and Spring B. The effects of the weights on Springs A and B for the three trials are shown below in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Experiment 2
The students attached a 0.25 m board with a high friction surface to Spring B and Spring C (see Figure 3). The students then placed a 5.0 N weight at different locations along the board. Because of the high friction surface, the weights stayed in place when the board was at an angle.
Figure 3
In each of these 3 trials, a 5.0 N weight was placed at various distances along the board from the attachment with Spring B (see Figure 4). In Trial 4, the weight was placed so its center was 0.075 m along the board from the attachment with Spring B. In Trial 5, the weight was placed so its center was 0.125 m along the board from the attachment with Spring B. In Trial 6, the weight was placed so its center was 0.200 m along the board from the attachment with Spring B. The effects of the weight position on the lengths of Springs B and C for the 3 trials are also shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Sodium chloride, or salt, is used to de-ice roads and sidewalks during the winter because it lowers the freezing point of water. Water with sodium chloride freezes at a lower temperature than water alone, so putting sodium chloride on icy sidewalks and roads can cause the ice to melt. Sodium chloride is highly effective as a de-icer and is given a de-icer proof of 100. Distilled water is ineffective as a de-icer and is given a de-icer proof of 0.
Different proportions of sodium chloride and distilled water were combined to create mixtures with de-icer proofs between 0 and 100.
Experiment 1
A 125-g cube of ice, frozen from distilled water, was submerged in 500-mL of each de-icing mixture listed in Table 1. After 300 seconds, the portion of the cube that had not been melted was removed and weighed. The de-icing rate was calculated by determining the weight of ice melted per second. By doing this, it was possible to determine de-icer proof for a solution based on the rate at which ice was melted.
Experiment 2
The addition of magnesium chloride to a de-icer changes its de-icer proof. Different amounts of magnesium chloride were added to 500-mL samples of sodium chloride. Each de-icing mixture was tested under the same conditions as Experiment 1 and the measured de-icing rate was used to calculate the de-icer proof. The results are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Experiment 3
The temperature rating (TR) is the minimum de-icer proof of a de-icing solution for a de-icer to have any effect on ice. 125-g cubes of ice were submerged in 500-mL samples of De-icers A and B and the samples were then placed in freezers at different temperatures. Table 2 shows the de-icer proof determined for each de-icer at each freezer temperature and the known TR for that temperature.