Workspace Science Test 91
← Back to Science
Science · Drill 91

Science practice 91

6 questions ~9 min recommended
00:00
Score
Table 1
Concentration SO₂ (ppm*)Measured absorbanceCorrected absorbance
0.00.1300.000
1.00.2830.153
2.00.4320.302
4.00.7300.600
8.01.3501.220
*ppm is parts per million

Concentration of SO₂1

Table 2
FruitCorrected absorbanceConcentration SO₂* (ppm)
craisins0.6684.4
prunes0.5623.72
banana chips0.0310.2
raisins0.9416.2
dried apricots0.7745.1
3

4

5

6

PASSAGE VI

Certain preservatives known as sulfites are often added to fruit products to keep the fruit fresher longer. Use of sulfites is controversial because studies have linked sulfites to severe reactions in some asthmatics. Students performed 2 experiments to measure sulfite levels.

Experiment 1

Four solutions, each containing a different amount of sulfite dissolved in H2O were prepared. A coloring agent was added that binds with sulfite to form a red compound that strongly absorbs light of a specific wavelength, and each solution was diluted to 100 mL. A blank solution was prepared in the same manner, but no sulfite was added. A colorimeter (a device that measures how much light of a selected wavelength is absorbed by a sample) was used to measure the absorbance of each solution. The absorbances were corrected by subtracting the absorbance of the blank solution from each reading (see Table 1 and Figure 1).

Figure 1

Experiment 2

A 100 g fruit sample was ground in a food processor with 50 mL of H2O and the mixture was filtered. The food processor and remaining fruit were then washed with H2O, these washings were filtered, and the liquid was added to the sample solution. The coloring agent was added and the solution was diluted to 100 mL. The procedure was repeated for several fruits, and the absorbances were measured (see Table 2).

1. Based on the results of Experiment 1, if the concentration of sulfite in a solution is doubled, then the corrected absorbance of the solution will approximately:

2. A sample of dried pineapple was also measured in Experiment 2 and its corrected absorbance was determined to be 0.603. Which of the following correctly lists prunes, apricots, and dried pineapple in decreasing order of corrected absorbance?

3. Based on the results of Experiment 1, if a solution with a concentration of 1.5 ppm sulfite had been tested, the corrected absorbance would have been closest to which of the following values?

4. If Experiments 1 and 2 were repeated using a different coloring agent that produces a different color when it binds with sulfite, which of the following changes in procedure would be necessary?

5. Based on the results of Experiments 1 and 2, if the measured absorbances for the fruits tested in Experiment 2 were compared with their corrected absorbances, the measured absorbances would be:

6. If some of the water-soluble contents found in all of the fruits tested in Experiment 2 absorbed light of the same wavelength as the compound formed with sulfite and the coloring agent, how would the measurements have been affected? Compared to the actual sulfite concentrations, the sulfite concentrations apparently measured would be: